Re: still to do ...

[John L. <mo...@co...>]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 08:12:30PM +0200, Philippe Elie wrote:

> > o get opf_filter and friends working OK
> 
> it work actually?

hmm, well it didn't for me when I tried it recently. I'll look again.

> > o re-do performance tests
> 
> really needed for a cvs version?

I want to characterise current UP vs SMP performance so we have a baseline for
0.0.6 improvements

> try in autconf 
> 
> #include <sstream>

sure

> > o make hashmap use string pool method
> 
> + fix zero dname map hash entry bug

perhaps we should do this now.

> trick to avoid rebuilding pathname inisde dameon.

I' ve already done this ! Please check it.

> + a gui to handle a notion of profiling session (not relied to the
> session_number variable used actually that I have miss-named)
> allowing easy maintenance of session and comparing results of
> session. I think at something like: opening a new sesssion create

sounds like a big job ;)

> I am go away 5/6 days from friday 24. I am unsure if we need my change
> to oprofpp.c / opf_filter.cpp before or after 0.05.

well let's see what they are. There's no big rush, and I still have to sort
out my own mess in the GUI, and do the tests

regards
john

-- 
"If you're not part of the problem, you're part of the problem space."