From: John L. <le...@mo...> - 2008-12-01 17:51:36
|
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:33:43AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > I then got rid of the d_cookie pointer. This shrinks it to 192 bytes. Rant: > why was this ever a good idea? The cookie system should increase its hash > size or use a tree or something if lookups are a problem. Are you saying you've made this change without even testing its performance impact? john |