From: Eric D. <da...@co...> - 2008-05-14 03:54:58
|
Gianni Tedesco a écrit : > > > Nope, exact same bad paging request in kernel mode... probably the bug > is something deep in oprofile then? > Hum... Are you using oprofile as a module or statically included in kernel ? Current module loader only allocates percpu room by examining ".data.percpu" section and should be augmented to also look at ".data.percpu.shared_aligned" Or, change DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() for modules (to use ".data.percpu" only) Anyway, with the per_cpu conversion of cpu_buffer, we dont need to request cache_line alignment anymore [PATCH] oprofile: Dont request cache line alignment for cpu_buffer Alignment was previously requested because cpu_buffer was an [NR_CPUS] array, to avoid cache line sharing between CPUS. After commit 608dfddd845da5ab6accef70154c8910529699f7 ( oprofile: change cpu_buffer from array to per_cpu variable ), we dont need to force an alignement anymore since cpu_buffer sits in per_cpu zone. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <da...@co...> |