From: John L. <le...@mo...> - 2007-04-19 12:13:31
|
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:59:03PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > > We need to work out a strategy to get this integrated. Baby steps. First > > off, since you have opcontrol-style features, it looks like we should > > replace our old control GUI with this code: that would imply extending > > it to cover what the old GUI can do. Would you be interested in this? > > The old gui is a UI for experts. Those experts will just go ahead and > use the command line tools anyway. This might apply to some of the options but I don't think it's true for the counter selection. Indeed, having a GUI interface to that makes it pretty easy to use. > > > It uses the XML output from opreport for the analysis but to make this > > > possible we needed to extend the XML to cover callgraphs. There were > > > also some other options we needed to add to various oprofile commands > > > such as the ability to list the files oparchive would process instead of > > > actually archiving them. > > > > Integrating each of these would be an obvious first step. > > Can you define 'integrating'? The plan is to have relatively loose > coupling of oprofileui from oprofile internals (hence why it uses the > XML format and the opcontrol scripts.) > > I'd love to see the patches that we need integrated into your tree (and > a 0.9.3 release made? ;-). We are of course more than happy to improve > them. I'd be happy to do a 0.9.3 once everything our side is in. But I'd /also/ like the GUI to come with oprofile too. Do you have an objection to that? regards john |