From: John L. <le...@mo...> - 2005-04-13 15:36:50
|
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:24:59AM -0500, Maynard P. Johnson wrote: > look at that problem. A valid workaround for this is to simply skip > the processing of such symbols, since we'd never get a source line > match anyway. The attached patch does just that. Applied. Please check that your ChangeLog entries are in the right format. thanks, john |