Re: [Opensync-users] Libsyncml

[Armin B. <arm...@de...>]

Maciek Borowka wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 July 2005 20:19, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
>
>>One question though: You use libwbxml, which changed its license from
>>LGPL to GPL. Is there a way around that? Because it would be pretty
>>pointless to have a non-GLP libsyncml, if it still requires a GPL
>>library.
>
>
> A question: what SyncML client stil uses wbxml these days?
>

uh... i think its the other way round. which client _isnt_ using wbxml
these days?

All mobile devices i know how can't even speak xml. They parse the wbxml
directly to save memory and bandwidth.

> I don't know of any, to be honest. In that case, we could live with the LGPL
> fork (which is not going to be really used after all)...
>
> ./Maciek
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> _______________________________________________
> Opensync-users mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensync-users