Re: [openorb-devel] Use of TransportAssociationHolder

[Joncheng K. <ck...@sy...>]

Chas Honton wrote:

> Joncheng Kuo wrote:
>
>> ... Basically, a client channel in ApacheORB may persist over a 
>> sequence of transports due to reconnect. In this way, your 
>> Channel.transport() method is not good because the transport may be 
>> lost any time unless you use the
>> NO_RECONNECT policy.
>>
> I don't see where the client channel gets associated with a new 
> Transport, where should I be looking?  In Delegate, whenever there is 
> a failover, the request is remarshalled.  The remarshalled request is 
> associated with the new channel (and new channel is associated with a 
> transport) 

In OpenORB, a client channel is always associated with a particular 
transport. No reconnection can happen without failing over to a new 
channel. The feature that I was talking about is in the future version 
of OpenORB, which will be called ApacheORB under the Apache umbrella.

Joncheng

>
>
> chas
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
> GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
> any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
> https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> openorb-devel mailing list
> ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openorb-devel
>
>