From: David H. <da...@op...> - 2005-07-20 21:02:45
|
See what you started Mr. Personality! LOL. On Jul 20, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Alexander Hoogerhuis wrote: > Matthew D Kelly wrote: > >> Be carefull with that attitude, just because it hasn't affected you >> yet doesn't mean it isnt something to think about. >> > > I have thought about it, and I have read about it, it's just that > for my purposes I have yet to get into a position where the I/O has > outweighed the need to know that the thing wont be backed up > relaibly and it's 6000 miles away. > > >> The bottom line is raid 5 is a poor choice for opennms no matter what >> controller and hardware you are using. >> > > It's not ideal and im sure that the crossover point between the > comfort and the I/O bottle neck is well and truly below what the > need is once you get into some of what the people on here speak of, > with interface count at 2^14 and upwards. Most of my installs are > in the low hundreds range, and I haven't seen any complication from > it yet. > > >> ---- Matthew Kelly University of Wyoming Library Systems (307) >> 766-5399 David Hustace The OpenNMS Group, Inc. http://www.opennms.com |