From: Paul M. <pm...@co...> - 2007-06-25 16:54:04
|
=20 As far as a bug with SNMP4J, I don't know. I moved back to JoeSNMP quite a while back after a suggestion from you to thread: Re: [opennms-discuss] Pix 515e SNMP error (212005: incoming SNMP request (611 bytes) From: DJ Gregor <dj@op...> - 2007-01-13 02:10=20 Notes: 1) In 1.3.2, SNMP4J is now the default SNMP implementation. You can=20 change it back to JoeSNMP, but you sacrifice SNMPv3 support for capsd=20 and collectd (trapd doesn't support v3, yet), as JoeSNMP only does v1=20 and v2c. 2) With SNMP4J, the *smallest* max-vars-per-pdu setting that it=20 supports is 484. I think that this might have something to do with=20 the minimum request size that the SNMP and/or UDP RFCs say that a=20 host must support. 3) Let us know if you get it to work, or if you still run into problems. - djg=20 I tried SNMP4J again, but it still fails to work with our Cisco PIX devices. |On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:42:37 -0700, "Paul Mona" <pm...@co...> |said: |> I don't know if this makes any difference, but I am running JoeSNMP=20 |> still. This is because of a bug with SNMP4J and Cisco PIX. When I=20 |> run SNMP4J openNMS is unable to walk the Cisco PIX and collect data. | |-----Original Message----- |From: ope...@li...=20 |[mailto:ope...@li...] On=20 |Behalf Of DJ Gregor |Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 8:54 PM |To: General OpenNMS Discussion |Subject: Re: [opennms-discuss] 1.3.3-1=20 |java.lang.OutOfMemoryError:Javaheapspace | |It would be good to see logs from this, if you haven't already=20 |provided them (is there a bug open for this?). |