RE: [openjms-developer] RE: [openjms-user] For OpenJMs Developers : OpenJMS Performance with Persistent Messages and Durable subscribers..

[Tim A. <tm...@ne...>]

Performance is largely determined by:
. the connector you are using
. the database

The rmi and tcp connectors are the fastest.
Try switching between the two to see if one works
better for your setup.

Same goes for the database - try several implementations to
work out which gives the most performance for your platform.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjeev Aggarwal [mailto:sag...@gg...]
> Sent: Monday, 30 June 2003 2:19 PM
> To: tm...@ne...; ope...@li...
> Subject: Re: [openjms-developer] RE: [openjms-user] For OpenJMs
> Developers : OpenJMS Performance with Persistent Messages and Durable
> subscribers..
>
>
> Any other thing that I can do to increase the performnace of OpenJMS with
> Durable subscribers and Persistent messages???
>
> Sanjeev
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Anderson" <tm...@ne...>
> To: <ope...@li...>
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 18:30
> Subject: [openjms-developer] RE: [openjms-user] For OpenJMs Developers :
> OpenJMS Performance with Persistent Messages and Durable subscribers..
>
>
> > Not a good idea. If the server goes down after the message
> > has been published to active subscribers, but before it is
> > made persistent, you will end up with inconsistency.
> > You would also have to add some synchronization to ensure
> > that acknowledgements for a message don't occur before the
> > message is made persistent.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ope...@li...
> > > [mailto:ope...@li...]On Behalf Of Sanjeev
> > > Aggarwal
> > > Sent: Friday, 27 June 2003 8:12 PM
> > > To: tm...@ne...; ope...@li...
> > > Cc: ope...@li...
> > > Subject: [openjms-user] For OpenJMs Developers : OpenJMS Performance
> > > with Persistent Messages and Durable subscribers..
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am using Persistent messages and Durable subscribers on Topics. I
> looked
> > > into the OpenJMS Code. Found that it is saving the JMSMessage into the
> > > database before publishing it to subscribers.
> > >
> > > Can I change it, in a way that message is published to
> > > subscribers and then
> > > saved in the database in a seperate thread so that subscribers
> > > gets a faster
> > > delivery of messages.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sanjeev.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
> > > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU
> Hosting Partner.
> > > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly
> Commission!
> > > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > openjms-user mailing list
> > > ope...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjms-user
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
> > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
> > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
> > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > openjms-developer mailing list
> > ope...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjms-developer
>
>