From: Yann D. <yd...@fr...> - 2001-12-18 14:49:13
|
Javier Farreres wrote: > I found sorprisingly easy the groves paradigm. But noone has tried > to read it. I have just recently written a stylesheet to turn a property-set into a set of HTML pages, and into a modules dependency graph. It is not 100% finished, but I already find the result incomparably clearer than the plain SGML file :) (Note: it has raised an issue about finding authoritative versions of the propset DTD and of the SGML propset, which I have not resolved) I'll have a dsssl-utils project created on savannah.gnu.org to host this and other tools I and others may want to write. I have also started to write a toy grove builder to get a better understanding of all this. The idea is to eventually turn it into a toy dsssl implementation, and possibly into a production tool. > > [pt] > > Full grove implementation is essential for adding any HyTime addressing and > > linking capabilities. It would also allow other possibilities, such as > > automatic DTD analysis and transformation. > > I have got the idea from the other replies. Groves are very interesting to > implement. Yes, I confirm. Trying to implement the thing raises interesting questions, and possible future directions for the standards, who knows... > About scheme, this is not so important. DSSSL could be based on other > languages. Well, after writing several stylesheets using the limited DSSSL subset provided by jade, I found the side-effect-free aspect of the language *really* helpful, and I guess not many languages outside of functional ones can express this adequately. Indeed, each time I felt limited by the side-effect-free aspect, I felt that the whole problem would probably have been simplified by a preliminar transformation step. -- Yann Dirson <Yan...@fr...> http://www.alcove.com/ Free-Software Engineer Ingénieur Logiciel-Libre Free-Software time manager Responsable du temps Informatique-Libre Debian GNU/Linux developper <di...@de...> |