From: Anton P. <ant...@pi...> - 2008-10-29 15:08:18
|
Shuah, cIpmiMc object do not represent AMC Module. So the proposed code block will be never executed at all. Anton Pak On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:58:15 +0300, Shuah Khan <shu...@hp...> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 18:02 +0000, Khan, Shuah wrote: >> Pierre, >> >> Yes. I misstated when I said it doesn't handle 5.0. What I meant to say >> is that the plug-in doesn't have the case for AMC modules. Is it okay to >> have the plug-in talk to AMC based on the site address communicated to >> it by the Carrier IPMC. The case I am dealing with is the IPMC on the >> AMC carrier bridges traffic and communicates AMC module site addresses >> as defined in 3.13.1. >> >> So the question is is it okay to add AMC case to cIpmiMc::CheckTca()? >> >> Sorry if I am not following what you are saying? > > Pierre, Anton, > > This is a good discussion, however I am not clear if there are any > problems adding this enhancement or not. Could you please let me know. > > -- Shuah > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Openhpi-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel |