Re: [Openh323gk-users] NAT traversal with GnuGK

[Leon L. <Le...@aa...>]

Hi Malcolm,

 

The GnuGK will be using to connecting different customers as a directory
proxy, and solve the problem of some customers' endpoints are behind
NAT.

 

I would like to know the possibility of both approaches you have below,
like:

1.       I setup a GK with public IP and any endpoints behind NAT can
register and communicate each other. This is the setup I have now with
Cisco GK. My endpoints behind NAT can setup calls, but result in one-way
audio which I suspect RTP packets are not delivered properly because of
NAT.

2.       Or  customer has their own GK behind NAT which can be
neighbouring with my GK with public IP. And RTP traffic is still handled
fine. 

 

Thanks,

Leon 

 

From: Malcolm Caldwell [mailto:Mal...@cd...] 
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 2:04 PM
To: Leon Li
Cc: ope...@li...
Subject: Re: [Openh323gk-users] NAT traversal with GnuGK

 

Hi Leon,

I am no gnugk expert, but I kow a bit.

I am not sure from your description what you are trying to do.

Do you want to have a gnugk on a public address, and use it to service
clients at home/small sites sitting behind a NAT type router (such as a
linksys)?

Or, do you want to have the the the gungk sitting on a private address
behind a NAT router (like a linksys)?

On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:24 +0000, Leon Li wrote:
> Anyone has an answer to this?
>
> 
>
> Regards,
>
> Leon
>
>
> 
>
> From: Leon Li [mailto:Le...@aa...]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2009 4:43 PM
> To: GNU Gatekeeper Users
> Subject: [Openh323gk-users] NAT traversal with GnuGK
>
>
> 
>
> Hi,
>
> 
>
> I am wondering whether the following network topology will work with
> GnuGK.
>
> 
>
> 1.      Endpoints (Private) NAT box (e.g. Linksys Router) GnuGK
> (public or private IP) Cisco GK (public IP) NAT box Endpoint (private
> IP)
>
> 2.      Endpoints (Private) NAT box (e.g. Linksys Router) GnuGK
> (public or private IP) Cisco GK (public IP) Endpoint (public IP)
>
> 
>
> If yes, what do I need to configure on GnuGK?
>
> 
>
> Thanks
>
> Leon
>
> 
>
>