From: Chris N. <cgn...@al...> - 2006-06-18 18:07:04
|
> > >I would note that there are other applications, such as uDig that are already >good WFS-T clients. It might be more practical to use them for such >applications. > > But it sucks for handling huge rasters, or better yet, seamlessly browsing a project area of high-res j2k orthos on a shared drive, like one can do with 'tindex''d layers in Mapserver. For this particular client, really basic overlay editing would be just fine; they just need to digitize, annotate, and share things. The basic ogr2ogr capabiity to get/put things into a single PostGIS table, or import/export to/from shapefile and CSV's. As for authentication, simple/straightforward libcurl http rfc2617 for WMS/WFS would be fine too... Now, as far as imagery encryption, that's a whole wunderworld unto itself...and more properly discussed on the gdal list or OGC DRM forum, but photomapper does indeed have some simple/stupid shared key mechanism to "unlock" imagery; they probably just tweeked the Kakadu i/o routine to do some sneaky rotor stuff; not sure, and not sure how important this is to this customer...but I'm sure its secondary to just panning/zooming/annotating collections of big j2k imagery files. Other question while I'm at it; what the state of 12-bit channel support? ...for Vexcel ...I mean Microsoft aerial sensors (why does that sound wierd?) Chris >Best regards, > > |