From: Peter Murray-R. <pm...@ca...> - 2003-04-27 09:31:44
|
At 09:40 24/04/2003 -0500, Geoff Hutchison wrote: >>I would suggest the latter since that would apply to any OB output >>format. The major difficulty would be naming the output files - which >>relates to names and IDs within the files (as above) or counting >>(mol1.mol, mol2.mol etc.) > >No. IMHO, the default should be to output a multiple-molecule file if the >output format supports it. This would keep the behavior of Babel 1.x. If >you wanted to split a file, you needed to add the -split option (which >goes with numbers for splits). Fine by me - does OB support -split? If you output multiple molecules in CML you will need a toplevel (root) element to keep the document well-formed. Traditionally this has been "<list>", as in: <list id="mollist23" title="steroids" dictRef="mydict:steroids"> <molecule id="m1" title="testosterone">...</molecule> .. <molecule id="m5" title="oestradiol">...</molecule> </list> (the attributes are optional, and at present there isn't a mechanism for adding all of them in OB. I strongly recommend generating them at least for the molecules, e.g. from sequence number, other IDs and/or title). P. |