Re: [Open64-devel] Gatekeeper code review request for AMD 4.2.5 merge

[Sun C. <sun...@gm...>]

sorry, I meant to get to it, but got bogged down. Give me a couple of days, pls
Sun

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Berg, Michael <mic...@am...> wrote:
> It’s been a while since this request went out, can a gate keeper please take
> look.
>
>
>
> Thx,
>
>
>
> m
>
>
>
> From: Berg, Michael [mailto:mic...@am...]
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 5:58 PM
>
> To: ope...@li...
> Subject: [Open64-devel] Gatekeeper code review request for AMD 4.2.5 merge
>
>
>
> All:  The attached patch files are:
>
>
>
> 1.)    Correctness changes for cvt operations
>
> 2.)    BD translation mapping updates for a set of instructions(AVX)
>
> 3.)    Scheduling additions for new spelling of ordered cmp instructions
>
> 4.)    And the definitions of those instructions in the machine description
> files.
>
>
>
> Can a Gatekeeper please review these changes which are part of our ongoing
> effort for BD support and code quality.
>
>
>
> These changes pass the following:
>
> a.)           No compile time failure for x86 build.
>
> b.)          The gcc regression test suite on x86/Linux with no new
> failures.
>
> c.)           The SPEC2006 test suite at with current AMD 1 copy config at
> both base and peak.
>
>
>
> Thx,
>
>
>
> m
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
>