Re: [Opalvoip-user] H.239 and H.460

[Jan W. <ja...@wi...>]

Hi,

yes, H.239 NAT traversal should also handled by H.460.18/.19.

I haven't tried the OPAL implementation, but from doing the server-side
implementation in GnuGk I remember that it was quite a bit more tricky
to get right than for bi-directional streams.

Regards,
Jan

-- 
Jan Willamowius, Founder of the GNU Gatekeeper Project
EMail  : ja...@wi...
Website: http://www.gnugk.org
Support: http://www.willamowius.com/gnugk-support.html

Relaxed Communications GmbH
Frahmredder 91
22393 Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Jan Willamowius
HRB 125261 (Amtsgericht Hamburg)
USt-IdNr: DE286003584


JD Rosensweig wrote:
> Hey Robert,
> 
>    Should NAT traversal for H.239 be handled by H.460?  The pin holing technique works great for two way sessions.  But I can’t seem to get it to work for content sharing.  Btw, my example is sharing from a public OPAL unit to a private hardware unit.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> JD