Re: [Opalvoip-devel] H.264 and other media formats priorities?

[Robert J. <ro...@vo...>]

The priorities are whatever you want them to be!

The only thing I can think of that links your "-P G.722-64k" breaking 
the H.264 selection, is that as soon as you use a -P it overrides the 
/entire/ default order. So, you need to put in -P options for everything 
you care about, or it is fairly random.

It probably should not do that, but at the moment, it does.

*Robert Jongbloed*
/OPAL/OpenH323/PTLib Architect and Co-founder./
Commercial support at http://www.voxlucida.com.au

On 2/10/2012 8:18 PM, Alexander Sbitnev wrote:
>     Which is priorities for H.264 fmts? Looking into
> DefaultMediaFormatOrder[] array from manager.cxx it looks like
> H.264-High is high priority right now (i temporarily remove it from
> format mask).
> And H.264-0 looks as lowest priority of all h.264 fmts.
>
> Using two simpleopal examples paired together i found next peculiarity:
> Without "-P G.722-64k" simpleopal option - H.264-High (or H.264-1 if
> H.264-High disabled) negotiated.
> With "-P G.722-64k" simpleopal option - H.264-0 negotiated.
>
> So custom priority for audio format affects priorities for video.
> It feels like in the case of -P usage for single format all default
> priorities drop and formats lined up according to their names.
> Is this behavior the way it suppose to be?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Opalvoip-devel mailing list
> Opa...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opalvoip-devel