Re: [Oorexx-devel] Array.testUnit question

[Rick M. <obj...@gm...>]

Wow, you got me.  See if you can create a minimal unit test that causes this
and open a bug report.  Something seriously screwy going on with this one.

Rick

On 10/9/07, David Ruggles <da...@sa...> wrote:
>
> I'm working on developing negative test cases in the array testunit and
> ran
> in to this problem:
>
> My test code:
> a = .array~new()
> a~put()
>
> Raises:
>      4 *-* a~put()
> Error 93 running C:\Dev\temp\test.rex line 4:  Incorrect call to method
> Error 93.903:  Missing argument in method; argument 1 is required
>
> However when I put it in the test unit like this:
> ::method "test_put_syntax1"
>
>   a=.array~new()
>   self~expectSyntax("93.903")
>   a~put()
>
> I get this:
>    [20071009 12:51:57.186000]: [error] testCase: [TEST_PUT_SYNTAX1] (an
> ooRexx.Base.Class.Array.TestUnit@C
> :\Dev\ooRexx\test\tests\oorexxunit\ooRexx\
> baseclass\ooRexx.Base.Class.Array.testUnit) ---> condition [SYNTAX 93.905]
> raised unexpectedly.    Method argument -2 must be a whole number; found
> "an
> Array"
>
> Why am I getting a 905 with a argument of -2?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Ruggles
> CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+
> Network Engineer        Safe Data, Inc.
> (910) 285-7200  da...@sa...
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oor...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>