From: David R. <da...@sa...> - 2007-10-05 19:42:02
|
Of course it was Rick "Bull in a china shop" McGuire's suggestion of = other tests that lead to this discovery! ;-) Thanks, David Ruggles CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+ Network Engineer Safe Data, Inc. (910) 285-7200 da...@sa... -----Original Message----- From: oor...@li... [mailto:oor...@li...] On Behalf Of Lee = Peedin Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:15 PM To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Revised TestUnit for array~makestring Mark, I like your suggestion of integrating into existing testunits. I'm just getting my feet wet right=20 now and was more interested in the actual tests than the structure. = Will download the current=20 testUnit and see what I'd have to do to integrate my tests with the = existing if possible and if not,=20 do like Rony suggested. Either way, I'm sure I need to study the = current "accepted" structure. The question still stands on the results of makeString "c" vs "l" on an array that contains=20 NonString items. If the answer is what David R thinks it is, then this little test case has already=20 uncovered a problem. Lee |