Re: [Oorexx-devel] DISCUSS: [oorexx:feature-requests] #613 Syntactic sugar for array creation

[Gil B. <gba...@al...>]

Erich,

Thanks for the updated documentation.  I especially like the *NEW* 
highlighting which makes it very easy to find all the new features in 
5.0.0.  I noticed that the StringTable class should also be marked as 
*NEW* as that was not in 4.2.0.  If I spot any others, I'll let you know.

As to the "name" for the syntactic sugar for array creation, I agree 
with Rick that "Array term" seems appropriate.  Thanks for all your hard 
work so far!

On 9/28/2015 6:49 AM, Erich Steinböck wrote:
> I've just committed documentation for [feature-requests:#613] 
> <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/613/> and uploaded 
> a new rexxref5.pdf build 
> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/5.0.0alpha/> to 
> the files section.  This new rexxref build temporarily marks new, 
> added 5.0 documentation sections with "*NEW*" to make it easier to see 
> what has changed from 4.2.
>
> As always, any suggestions are welcome.  Specifically I'd like to get 
> your feedback for the naming of this feature request.  After reading 
> 1.11. Terms, Expressions, and Operators I decided to go for "Array 
> term" - see section 1.11.6.
>
> Should we stick to that?  Or use "Array expression" (although 
> technically probably wrong)?  "Array notation (would we then need to 
> define the term "notation")?  "Array syntax"?  What do you feel?
>
> Erich
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oor...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
> -- 
> Gil Barmwater