Re: [Oorexx-users] progressHandler problem

[Staffan T. <sta...@gm...>]

>
>
> Even after I make a change, I expect that you'll find  that a value of 1
> is way to small for the number of virtual machine instructions to be
> executed between each callback.  Calling back into Rexx after every virtual
> machine instructions is certain to introduce a lot of over-head.
>
>
Yes, I'm fully aware that 1 is far to small but I used that as a starting
point while I tried this out for the first time. I've since found that 1000
seems to be a usable value with very little overhead when just adding 1 to
a counter as in my example. So running the same program with an interval of
1000 reveals that 13,000,000+ virtual machine instructions are needed for
this particular SQL statement. It still runs in 1 second so one can't
complain :)


> If you would have a small test program you can send me for this, it would
> help.  ;-)
>
>
I will see what I can do.

Staffan