From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-03-28 04:17:36
|
Bugs item #2951893, was opened at 2010-02-15 00:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by miesfeld You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2951893&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: External Functions Group: v4.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Bob Martin (rvmartin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Failure in SysStemDelete Initial Comment: SysStemDelete deletes the nominated record and moves the following records up one, but it does not decrease the record count. This is in 64-bit version only. OK in 32-bit ooRexx. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Miesfeld (miesfeld) Date: 2010-03-27 20:17 Message: Ah, shoot - I was just on a Linux today and I forgot to test this. Bob, the ooRexx 4.0.1 beta is now available and this should be fixed in that. Could you test the beta and see if this is still a problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Miesfeld (miesfeld) Date: 2010-02-15 09:41 Message: Oh, he says sheepishly, I didn't look closely enough at the commit. ;-( Plus, I only looked at the current code, which is of course the replacement code. It should be fixed, I'll verify that today. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2010-02-15 09:36 Message: I'm not sure why you say that....my earlier fix completely replaced all of the SysStemDelete code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Miesfeld (miesfeld) Date: 2010-02-15 09:33 Message: Rick, yeah I'll test it, as soon as I can boot up a Linux system. Should be today. I had glanced at the code, and it didn't look to me like the other fix you did would effect SysStemDelete(). I could easily be wrong though. <grin> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2010-02-15 08:07 Message: Mark, could you verify that this is working correctly on your 64-bit linux system? I suspect this should be working correctly now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2951893&group_id=119701 |