Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [ oorexx-Documentation-2759880 ]

[Rick M. <obj...@gm...>]

I'd just leave it there.  It's really just acts as a list of what
error messages are available for use.

Rick

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Rick McGuire <obj...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> Error messages, once added to the table, tend to become part of the
>> programming interface because the RAISE instruction can still be used
>> to raise them.  I think this needs to be left as is.
>
> Thanks, that is sort of what I was thinking.
>
> Should we take it out of the doc itself?  Not too hard to do, but
> since DocErrorMessages.sgml is autogenerated, someone would have to
> remember to to take it out of errnums.sgml each time some error
> numbers were updated. It seems easier to just leave it in the doc.
>
> ---
> Mark Miesfeld
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
> Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oor...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>