From: Rick M. <obj...@gm...> - 2009-02-15 16:12:36
|
"early availability" maybe? I think I'd vote for alpha over pre-beta because it does have a defined meaning. Rick On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: > Rick, > > Okay, good review of where you are at. I was going to post a similar > thing today. (Hopefully.) > > I'm finishing up the WindowsEventLog doc, where I had added quite a > bit. I should finish today. When I do, I will have documented all the > changes I've done and done all the doc review I had planned to do. > So, by the end of today, maybe tomorrow, we should have all the > changes to main/trunk documented. > >> Given the amount of doc work that seems to be required yet, I think we >> really should focus some attention on getting a "kick-the-tires" alpha >> download available. I've got a 64-bit Linux version available, but >> I'm not sure how to build the RPM (or even if it will build on this >> platform). > > I agree. I know how to set the stuff up on SourceForge so I'll get > that started this evening. I think David's out of touch until > tomorrow. Maybe he can do the official notice. > > I don't think we need to do a formal branch with this kick-the-tires > download. In fact, I thought we could just add builds to it as we get > them done. > > The 32-bit / 64-bit Windows builds I can get on SourceForge today. I > get tomorrow off, and I was hoping to get a 64-bit Linux installed. > If so I can get a 64-bit RPM on SourceForge by the end of the day on > Monday. > > That leaves the release name for SourceForge. Is 4.0.0-pre-beta or > 4.0.0-alpha good enough? If so which one do we prefer. I actually > like pre-beta best. However, alpha is a somewhat standard name. > > -- > Mark Miesfeld > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Rick McGuire <obj...@gm...> wrote: >> Ok, I've finished a top-to-bottom review of the reference, and cleaned >> up quite a bit. I think we have all of the new features documented >> finally, so that part is done. The one section I skipped was the >> Rexxutil functions, so if anybody wants to review that, it would be >> great. I think at a minimum, someone needs to go through and make >> sure we are documenting the functions that are there (and only the >> functions that are there!). >> >> I'm now working on the rexxpg, doing a similar top-to-bottom review. >> I'm finding it needs a lot of updates. For one thing, it still refers >> to "Object Rexx" everywhere. It's also assumes Windows in many, many >> places, so I'm going to try to make it more platform agnostic. I'm >> also finding it talks about things that are just flat-out wrong, which >> is a little disturbing. Anyway, this review is long overdue, so that >> will be keeping me busy for the next week. I also have a couple of >> sections of the API ref I need to complete, but haven't decided how I >> want to write them yet. >> >> Given the amount of doc work that seems to be required yet, I think we >> really should focus some attention on getting a "kick-the-tires" alpha >> download available. I've got a 64-bit Linux version available, but >> I'm not sure how to build the RPM (or even if it will build on this >> platform). >> >> Rick >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA >> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise >> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation >> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >> _______________________________________________ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oor...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > |