From: Nicolas C. <war...@fr...> - 2005-01-17 10:36:11
|
I agree here. The one willing to write the tests are free to choose how they want to write them. Nicolas > Hi all, > > I am willing to help if you have any trouble with the existing ExtLib > tester. I think the assertion mechanism is easy to use and easy to > understand, but of course I'm biased since I wrote the suite. > > extlib-test/readme.html has a some documentation on how to make new tests. > > When I embarked on writing the test suite, I was more interested in > making the actual tests rather than discussing on what kind of a > framework to use for the tests. > > Perhaps someone could clarify what is gained by using OUnit instead of > the current suite? I personally feel that the real test cases are what > counts, not the testing framework. > > Best regards, > Janne > > skaller wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 11:37, Brian Hurt wrote: > > > >>My apologies for being silent for so long (life intervened). One > >>question on this subject: is there a reason we're not using OUnit? > > > > > > Dependencies. The test mechanism needs to be independent > > of everything that isn't either in standard Ocaml > > distro or Extlib. > > > > This problem would go away if GODI was standard > > but it isn't .. |