From: Richard J. <ri...@an...> - 2004-08-25 14:33:04
|
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:12:41AM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Well, I don't really see the point in adding it just to one driver. > The whole idea behind Dbi is that it's an abstraction layer, so I'd > like to keep things portable. Thanks for the response though. It's more of an abstraction layer for the programmer than for databases. It'd be very hard to truly abstract away the myriad differences between databases - eg. how would you emulate sub-selects or Postgres's Perl stored-procedures on MySQL; or the differences in date/timestamp representations between PostgreSQL and Informix? Rich. --=20 Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://www.j-london.com/ Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment If I have not seen as far as others, it is because I have been standing in the footprints of giants. -- from Usenet |