From: fva <fv...@ts...> - 2003-03-06 09:28:23
|
Nicolas Cannasse wrote: >Hi, > >I can up with another idea this morning ( yes, morning : it's currently 10am >in Japan ). What about the name of "Vector". That's short, understandable, >and people coming from the Java world will be more that happy to find a data >structure with which they can do add/remove. > I don't know whether "vector" is too overloaded (maths, computing) to be any indicator of what is really contained there, but I prefer it to RefList... This really smacks of the implementation (which is OK if you want to make it patent, though). Also, I was happy with any of the M(.)+List suggestiongs, but the most criptic MList (sorry Nicolas!), but Ialso your right to name your datatype as you think fit. On the other hand, the question raised by your putting forht "MList" still remains: how to go about naming new modules, etc. Have we reached and agreement about this with the "small list of rules" discussed this week? Regards, Fran Valverde |