From: Chris M. <cj...@fr...> - 2007-02-17 02:19:03
|
On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Nigam Shah wrote: >>> - as OBO 1.2+ mirrors OWL, and we have OWL plugins and parsers for >>> the major editors, is there not a case for just using OWL? - >>> apologies if this is old ground rather than new.... >> >> It is old ground, and the answer is emphatically, no :-) > > Hey Chris, > > Can you list the main arguments for this. It will help in multiple > ways (including the OBO to OWL paper). I think the question needs to be more carefully formulated before I devote time to relisting all the arguments. What exactly is the scenario Stuart is proposing above? I find the question sort of unusual. > --Nigam. > > |