Re: [Obo-envo] submission of terms from GEMINA

[Aaron G. <agu...@gm...>]

I think a Skype call would be great, however Monday's not good.  How about
Tuesday, say 10am EST (2pm GMT, I think)?

On 10/26/07, Norman Morrison <mor...@cs...> wrote:
>
> I've been working through some of the terms that Aaron submitted. I've
> suggested that we have a skype chat on Monday afternoon to work through
> them further since Aaron has some bandwidth at the moment.
>
> There are some interesting questions that arise that should probably be
> followed through on the tracker... watch that space :-)
>
> Chris Mungall wrote:
> > On Oct 25, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Aaron Gussman wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi Dawn,
> >>   I'm not entirely sure where the Gemina "biological products"
> >> terms I added to the tracker ( http://sourceforge.net/tracker/
> >> index.php?func=detail&aid=1807500&group_id=76834&atid=934923)
> >> should go.  In Gemina, we are using them to describe human anatomy
> >> and most of the terms are too specific to be considered common to
> >> all organisms/animals.
> >>
> >
> > Is the full list on the tracker?
> >
> >
> >>   I'm trying to remember what was discussed at the meeting, and I
> >> want to say the agreement was to use cross products for
> >> environments that are anatomy+organism.
> >>
> >
> > unfortunately we don't have a comprehensive enough species-neutral
> > anatomy ontology. You can use FMA for the human terms, but for wool,
> > bird feces, cow rumen etc it would seem reasonable to have a small
> > set in envo for now. When the appropriate external ontologies are in
> > place we can obsolete these and add replaced_by tags pointing at the
> > appropriate terms.
> >
> >
> Seems like a sensible course of action...
> >>   I'd be happy to throw together a quick webpage with basic EnvO
> >> info.  I'm not sure if www.envoc.org can be made to point to a
> >> website hosted at the sourceforge site though, since there's not a
> >> dedicated envo project, it's under obo.  Maybe someone on the list
> >> can confirm/deny the ability to host at sourceforge or offer
> >> hosting services?
> >>
> >
> > we can set up something such as http://obo.sf.net/envoc; or do we
> > need a dedicated host? We can do this at berkeley I believe
> >
> The "physical" hosting of the www.envoc.org website is something I hope
> to discuss with the coordination committee on Tuesday 30th Oct. Will
> feedback the decision to this list...
> >
> >> -Aaron
> >>
> >> On 10/5/07, Dawn Field <df...@ce...> wrote: Aaron - these look
> >> like good additions and in the right places.  Many thanks.  I need
> >> 'discharge' and 'effluent' from ear :-) as I start to look at
> >> GOLD...so now that this is moving and can start submitting some
> >> too.  Do we want human-associated or did you just mean 'organism-
> >> associated'.  As in any species could have the things listed by
> >> GEMINA for humans.
> >>
> >> Norman - are you going to take care of this?   The latest version
> >> of EnvO is committed right?  This isn't coming through the tracker
> >> though is it?  It should, right?
> >>
> >> We need to link up all the bits of the infrastructure now...A
> >> simple page at the HomePage URL  would be really helpful - to
> >> contain a link to the Wiki pages,  the mailing list, the tracker,
> >> and the actual ontologies - at least.
> >>
> >> Anyone willing to do this - prior to knowing whether Norman's
> >> collegue will take this on in the long run?
> >>
> >> I assume it could just be uploaded to the sourceforge site?
> >>
> >> Dawn
> >>
> >>
>
>