From: Alan R. <ala...@gm...> - 2014-05-28 05:22:52
|
Order of creation of the terms suggest that the SIO term is the duplicate. On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Michel Dumontier < mic...@gm...> wrote: > Or you could just use the SIO term directly instead of unnecessarily > having a duplicate IRI. > > hmm... > > m. > > Michel Dumontier > Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford > University > Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest > Group > http://dumontierlab.com > > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Alan Ruttenberg > <ala...@gm...> wrote: > > Or you could just use the RO term directly instead of unnecessarily > having a > > duplicate IRI. > > -Alan > > > > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Michel Dumontier > > <mic...@gm...> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Chris, > >> all good points. i would be open to changing the definition as you > >> suggest. adding the transitive/non-transitive form to RO would be nice, > and > >> we could add the SIO-RO mapping. > >> > >> m. > >> > >> > >> Michel Dumontier > >> Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford > >> University > >> Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest > >> Group > >> http://dumontierlab.com > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Chris Mungall <cjm...@lb...> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> This followed from the original definition in the RO paper, in which > the > >>> derived must have a significant portion of matter from the derivee. > There is > >>> no guarantee that this property holds transitively. > >>> > >>> In practice this has not been a problem as this relation is not widely > >>> used (at all?). The most common derivation use case for RO is > development, > >>> and the develops from hierarchy follows the intuitive nomenclature of > having > >>> the non-transitive subtype be prefixed with "immediately" > >>> > >>> See for example: > >>> http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002207 > >>> > >>> For non-developmental use cases: I think the cleanest thing to do here > is > >>> obsolete http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0001000 'derives from' and > to > >>> introduce two new properties, with clear labels indicating the > transitive or > >>> lack of transitive characteristic. > >>> > >>> Michel, for SIO has > >>> > >>> + derives into [Transitive] > >>> +--- immediately derives into > >>> > >>> With defs: > >>> > >>> "a derives to b if and only if a or some part thereof is consumed in > the > >>> formation of b" > >>> > >>> "a immediately derives into b if and only if a or some significant part > >>> thereof is consumed in the formation of b and there are no identifiable > >>> intermediate entities between a and b." > >>> > >>> Is this correct? > >>> > >>> Let's say we have a chain of IDI relations, a1 IDI a2 IDI a3 …. IDI a_n > >>> > >>> It follows that a_1 DT a_n, by the OWL axioms. > >>> > >>> However, this may contradict the definition of DT; the formation of a_n > >>> may be significantly temporally downstream of the consumption of a_1. > >>> > >>> Maybe the def of DT should read: > >>> > >>> "a derives to b if and only if a or some part thereof is consumed in > the > >>> formation of b *or as part of a causal series of events leading to the > >>> formation of b*" > >>> > >>> Or simply > >>> > >>> "this is the transitive form of IDI" > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 23 May 2014, at 14:30, Michel Dumontier wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Ramona, > >>>> SIO has a derives into transitive relation: > >>>> http://semanticscience.org/resource/derives-into > >>>> > >>>> along with the non-transitive relation > >>>> http://semanticscience.org/resource/immediately-derives-into > >>>> > >>>> best, > >>>> > >>>> m. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Michel Dumontier > >>>> Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford > >>>> University > >>>> Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest > >>>> Group > >>>> http://dumontierlab.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Ramona Walls <rlw...@gm...> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Can someone clarify why the derives from relation is not transitive? > I > >>>>> need to use a derivation relation that is transitive, and would > rather > >>>>> not > >>>>> create my own. Is there something else I should be using in RO? > >>>>> > >>>>> Ramona > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> Ramona L. Walls, Ph.D. > >>>>> Scientific Analyst, The iPlant Collaborative, University of Arizona > >>>>> Laboratory Research Associate, New York Botanical Garden > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For > FREE > >>>>> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. > >>>>> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform > >>>>> available > >>>>> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Obo-relations mailing list > >>>>> Obo...@li... > >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-relations > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > >>>> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. > >>>> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform > >>>> available > >>>> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > >>>> > >>>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs_______________________________________________ > >>>> Obo-relations mailing list > >>>> Obo...@li... > >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-relations > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > >> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. > >> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform > >> available > >> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Obo-relations mailing list > >> Obo...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-relations > >> > > > |