From: Suzanna L. <su...@fr...> - 2004-06-03 20:33:49
|
Hi Simon, I'd be curious which mandatory fields are giving you grief. Perhaps if you told us this we can figure out a solution. I am having trouble imagining what the difficulty is. later, S Simon Cross wrote: >Greetings, > >We're in the process of creating GO flat file and GO OBO file versions >of the eVOC ontologies >(http://obo.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?evoc or >http://www.sanbi.ac.za/evoc/). We would like to annotate the terms with >cDNA libraries but it seems neither the GO flat file nor the newer GO >OBO file formats make provision for this. > >I am aware of the GO annotation file format but that is designed for >linking genes or gene products to terms and is not really flexible >enough for out purposes. Specifically there are numerous mandatory >fields which we can't assign useful values to. > >How are other OBO people handling annotations when using the GO >formats? Or other formats for that matter? > >Schiavo >Simon Cross > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one >installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and >evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 >_______________________________________________ >Obo-discuss mailing list >Obo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss > > |