Re: [Obo-format] order of tags in Typedef's

[Erick A. <eri...@gm...>]

yes, I second the motion of clearing up the ordering aspects in the
spec by making use of the RFC 2119.

Erick

On 8 October 2010 18:15, Alan Ruttenberg <ala...@gm...> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Chris Mungall <CJM...@lb...> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, this is now fixed in the guide
>>
>> The URL below is the guide, not the spec btw - the current draft of
>> the spec is
>>        http://berkeleybop.org/~cjm/obo2owl/obo-syntax.html
>> The spec doesn't currently include the tag ordering, as this is a
>> suggestion and non-normative, but it could be added as an informative
>> section
>
> Let's add, as in other specs,
>
> "The italicized keywords must, must not, should, should not, and may
> are used to specify normative features of OWL 2 documents and tools,
> and are interpreted as specified in RFC 2119 [RFC 2119]."
>
> [RFC 2119]
> RFC 2119: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels.
> Network Working Group, S. Bradner. IETF, March 1997,
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
>
> Then, let's be careful about the use of these words. In the markup of
> the OWL spec, we used <em class="RFC2119" title="SHOULD in RFC 2119
> context">SHOULD</em> in the html.
>
> It sounds like ordering of tags would be a "MAY", if anything
> (probably just a informative suggestion). If we do mention ordering in
> such a fashion, there should be a motivating statement. What would
> that statement be?
>
> -Alan
>
>
>>
>> On Oct 6, 2010, at 1:51 AM, Erick Antezana wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> which should be the ordering of the following tags?
>>>
>>> intersection_of
>>> union_of
>>> disjoint_from
>>>
>>> in Typedef's?
>>>
>>> The spec (http://www.geneontology.org/GO.format.obo-1_4.shtml ) gives
>>> only a hit about the order of those tags for the Terms but not
>>> Typedef's.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Erick
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
>>> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
>>> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating
>>> great
>>> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Obo-format mailing list
>>> Obo...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-format
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
>> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
>> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
>> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Obo-format mailing list
>> Obo...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-format
>>
>