From: David Osumi-S. <dj...@ge...> - 2009-11-18 18:21:07
|
Alan's suggestion here makes much more sense to me than treating fixed as a quality. On 18 Nov 2009, at 17:47, Alan Ruttenberg <ala...@gm...> wrote: > If you mean "fixed" as in has been put in fixative, for example, then > this would be an example of something OBI has been dealing with. We > think that there are a bunch of terms that are adjective in form, but > which don't name qualities in the BFO (or PATO) sense. Rather what > they mean is that the substance in question has undergone some process > and that the annotation should be to the process, not as a quality. > Certainly there are qualities and dispositions that arise from such a > process, but they aren't the same as the term the adjective denotes. > > For example, consider "digested". One can't tell by looking at a > substance whether it has been trypsin digested - you have to know that > it got to be the way it is in a certain way. We annotate such entities > in OBI by saying they are the specified output of, e.g., a trypsin > digestion process as specified in some protocol. > > There are a number of terms in PATO that are of this nature, and > there's a conversation been started with Chris about this. I'm curious > about your thoughts on this, and in the short term would recommend > that in cases where you are describing not-occurring-nature things > like "fixing" you consider seeing if OBI has what you want, or > submitting a term request. Information about our recent release is at > http://obi-ontology.org/page/Releases/2009-11-06 > > Regards, > Alan > > ps. The OBI part of this conversation is at > http://groups.google.com/group/obi-developer/browse_thread/thread/a7b3157d8f9b98fb > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Nicole Washington <NLW...@lb... > > wrote: >> hello, >> >> how could i go about capturing the two status' of tissues that have >> either been treated or untreated with a reagent, such as to render >> them "fixed" or "living" in an assay? >> >> i see a term mobile, PATO:0000300, which has "fixed" as a synonym, is >> defined as "A mobility quality inhering in a bearer by virtue of the >> bearer's being incapable to move freely". >> >> think this is the right term to use? >> >> and how do i capture the opposite, unfixed? should that be immobile? >> >> nicole >> >> --- >> --- >> --- >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports >> 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - >> and focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Obo-phenotype mailing list >> Obo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-phenotype >> > > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Obo-phenotype mailing list > Obo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-phenotype |