From: Scott N. <sni...@sc...> - 2003-10-28 03:28:19
|
> If I am sending over information that I know > will be correct, and not send back a fault, then I get back everything = fine, > no error, no 500 errors.=20 To be sure I understand: when your client sends a "good" request, you = get the response you expect, right? > If I send over another request that I know should > give back an error "return new soap_fault" that is when I get 500 = errors and > then all the bad stuff. I see the error message that I sepecified in = the > soap_fault in all the error stuff. It is expected behavior that a returned SOAP Fault would be in an HTTP = response with a 5xx status, as that is required by the SOAP spec. = However, I assume that if everything were groovy, you would be saying = your client indicated there was a SOAP fault, and everything was = working, but you are not saying that, so the client is not indicating a = fault, right? What is your client showing in this case? Scott Nichol Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, because it is filtered to accept only mail from specific mail lists. |