From: Todd M. <jm...@st...> - 2004-10-01 20:29:44
|
Thanks Pearu. For some unknown reason, numarray.random_array already had the fixes, but I applied the patch to Numeric CVS. Regards, Todd On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 15:38, Pearu Peterson wrote: > On 1 Oct 2004, Todd Miller wrote: > > > look at this: > > > > >>> from RandomArray import * > > > > >>> normal(2,2,10) > > array([ 2., 2., 2., 2., 2., 2., 2., 2., 2., 2.]) > > > > This is Numeric 23.1 compiled on my AMD64!!! I ran the same tests on a > > 32bit P4 and it ran fine. > > Has anyone else seen this before? > > Yes. I just fixed a similar issue in scipy.stats.rand module. Below is the > corresponding patch for Numeric Src/ranlibmodule.c that fixes the issue > for Opteron. > > Regards, > Pearu > > *** ranlibmodule.c Fri Oct 1 22:29:57 2004 > --- ranlibmodule.c.orig Fri Oct 1 22:12:13 2004 > *************** > *** 47,49 **** > case 0: > ! *out_ptr = (double) ((float (*)(void)) fun)(); > break; > --- 47,49 ---- > case 0: > ! *out_ptr = (double) ((double (*)()) fun)(); > break; > *************** > *** 81,83 **** > case 1: > ! if( !PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "lf|i", &int_arg, &float_arg, &n) ) { > return NULL; > --- 81,83 ---- > case 1: > ! if( !PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "if|i", &int_arg, &float_arg, &n) ) { > return NULL; > *************** > *** 213,215 **** > > ! if( !PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "lO|i", &num_trials, &priors_object, &n) ) { > return NULL; > --- 213,215 ---- > > ! if( !PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "iO|i", &num_trials, &priors_object, &n) ) { > return NULL; > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Num...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion -- |