From: Jim A. <JA...@th...> - 2007-08-06 18:22:46
|
Well, I'm glad you said it first. Jim Steve Freeman <st...@m3...> Sent by: nmo...@li... 06/08/2007 19:21 To nmo...@li... cc Subject Re: [Nmock-general] FW: NMock, MSTest and Interface Implementation Which begs the question, much as I dislike its syntax, as to whether we should all just use Rhino. S On 6 Aug 2007, at 14:16, Jim Arnold wrote: > I would much rather see NMock 2 use a mature code-gen > implementation (such > as Castle Proxy) which has already solved these problems. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Nmock-general mailing list Nmo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-general |