From: Nat P. <nat...@gm...> - 2005-07-21 07:49:11
|
I vote for the latter until VS2005 is out of beta (sometime in 2006?). It's bad enough having people use alpha software without having to support building it with beta software! --Nat. On 7/20/05, Mike Mason <mik...@gm...> wrote: > On 7/14/05, Josh MacKenzie <jos...@gm...> wrote: >=20 > > We used the built in migration wizzer for moving the 2003 sln and > > csproj files to 2005beta2 - it's a bit flakey, but we made it work (it > > will refuse to migrate the csproj files the first time around, but > > will import them later if you open the solution and re-import the > > projects. >=20 > I've done the same thing but am wondering how we should proceed on > this. Should we have two solution files, one for 2005 and one for > 2003, or stick with the 2003 and let people who are "in the know" > upgrade themselves. >=20 > Having two is gonna be something of a maintenance pig, methinks. Any > fancy ideas? >=20 > Cheers, > Mike. >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id=16492&opclick > _______________________________________________ > NMock-two-dev mailing list > NMo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev > |