RE: [Netatalk-devel] CNID Working?

[Daniel E. L. <da...@bo...>]

I'm wondering if your earlier commit has broken the ability for proper db3
library checking on SuSE...

-Dan

On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Jonathan Newman wrote:

>
> > I believe it was. Can anyone answer this?
> >
> > So everybody: If Lawrence was losing data before with
> > with-did-last, and now
> > he's not, can we account for it? It's never too comforting when a
> > show-stopper bug goes away and no one knows why.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > > I think the ones before that were pre6. If that was the default then
> > > yes.
> > >
> > > Lawrence Farr
> > > EPC Direct Limited
>
> Was it the default then?  I think the default has been the dev/inode -> DID
> method and not the last method.  Shouldn't be too hard to confirm...  Just
> downloaded the pre6 tarball, and last has to be specifically enabled
> here.  --enable-lastdid.  So if that wasn't enabled, then the dev/inode
> mapping would take place.  In other words, Lawrence wasn't using last, if he
> didn't specifically enable it.
>
> Jon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netatalk-devel mailing list
> Net...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-devel
>