From: didier <dga...@ma...> - 2010-04-18 22:57:00
|
Hi, Le dimanche 18 avril 2010 à 09:02 +0200, Frank Lahm a écrit : > >> > >> I've wiped the prior git import and now pushed this. Do we like it? > >> <http://netatalk.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb-index.cgi> > > Ok but not all branches are in. > > git branch -a > > * master > > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master > > remotes/origin/branch-dircache-rewrite > > remotes/origin/master > > Yes, of course. Because as said: > > > I've removed all branches only keeping dircache and main > > which now gives me [1] Sorry miss this one. > > Why importing dead branches into git ? Why not just start from a > leighweight state instead of dragging all the stuff over ? In case It's not that big and IMO history is important. Anyway can we extract 2.0.x from this git tree? We may have to release one more 2.0.x and using both git and cvs would be error prone. > that this wasn't clear: I was assuming we'd keep CVS accessible exacty > for this purpose. No keeping CVS around was only for transition and is not important. What do we do for docs and test suite trees? Didier |