From: Anton S. <ant...@gm...> - 2009-12-17 21:18:10
|
On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:47 AM, didier wrote: >> Is it necessary to keep it switchable? But then code will full of if/else which can degrade performance. > In current implementation server side symlinks are unreliable, without > fixing them I don't see the point for a switch. Me to. I just don't see any reasons why one would switch this off. > >> I mean, if some people use it to to share something outside of volume, they can use "mount -o bind". > mount -o bind is a lot newer than netatalk code :). I know :) But people have to read manual at least sometimes :) > >> For me it is a bit strange. >> For files it has no options to ask to follow link, but for attributes it can ask to follow on server side. >> >> Do I miss something? > I don't think so for me it looks like they copy and paste from the unix > specs 'in case'. what kind of specs? Is there something else except apple documentation? |