From: Frank L. <fra...@go...> - 2009-09-13 14:39:01
|
I've started a new thread in order not to spoil Simon's thread. Thanks for the summary. I made some comments inline below: > After one week we changed to the old server with Helios: > > a) Searching on the Netatalk-Volume -> very slowly, because there is no > Index of the Files. In fact netatalk has an index: the CNID database. Nevertheless I can indeed reproduce that netatalk is way slower for searches compared to Helios. Can you file a bug report on this please so I can remember to come back to this and fix it ?! Thanks. > That we know befor and we would use a SharewareProgramm > for Searching - not a big problem > > b) the real problem was navigating through the FileSystem: > > -- ServerVolume > -- Pictures > -- Year > -- Object (up to 100 Folders) > -- 01 > -- 02 > ... > -- 51 > -- 52 > > That is the simple Stucture of our Folders - every opening of the Folder > need much more time as under the old helios-server. The Folder-Icons and the > FileIcons would build up every time new. Under Helios you doubleklick of a > foldericon -> schwupp, it opens the now folderwindow with directly showing > the icons inside. Can't reproduce. Were these files and folders using custom icons ? I've conducted another synthetic benchmark with a folder containing 5000 subfolders. $ time find /Volumes/netatalk/dir -type d -exec GetFileInfo {} \; > /dev/null real 2m32.260s user 0m17.198s sys 0m25.405s $ time find /Volumes/HELIOS/dir -type d -exec GetFileInfo {} \; > /dev/null real 3m8.828s user 0m17.380s sys 0m26.635s $ > So - after a week working with netatalk, we switched back to the old server > and i build up the new one with helios :( If you ever reavaluate netatalk I can only encourage you to take your problems and questions to this list or contact me off-list. -Frank |