Re: [Netatalk-devel] Cross-compile Netatalk

[Frank L. <fra...@go...>]

Well then. Just glad I don't have to digg into this... ;o)

-Frank

2009/5/31 Jon Stevens <lat...@gm...>:
> No idea if it is even worth changing. scratchbox is really the way to go
> simply because netatalk's dependencies: avahi, dbus, etc. also sometimes
> have problems cross compiling as well. scratchbox is a fairly difficult to
> configure and figure out hacky solution, but it works oh so well.
> My setup is MacOSX with an x86 processor running Ubuntu in vmware running
> qemu in scratchbox emulating an arm (powerpc works too) processor.
> Boggles my mind that it all works so well.
>
> jon
> My blog: http://lookfirst.com/
>
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Frank Lahm <fra...@go...>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2009/5/31 Jon Stevens <lat...@gm...>:
>> > Before I discovered scratchbox, I had to hack the sh*t out of netatalk's
>> > configure scripts to get things to compile.
>> > jon
>> > My blog: http://lookfirst.com/
>>
>> If possible I'd be willing to fix our autoconf stuff as neccessary.
>> Are there any other issues besides the ones cauesd by AC_TRY_RUN and
>> the like:
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/html_node/Runtime.html#Runtime
>> http://sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_269.html#SEC269
>> I.e. would it be sufficient for you cross compiling guys if we add a
>> fourth argument of `true` to all checks ?
>>
>> -Frank
>
>