From: Thomas K. <Tho...@ph...> - 2003-12-31 15:48:24
|
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:07:22 -0500, Chris Woodfield wrote: [branch-netatalk-afp-3x-dev] > Sure you didn't mean "worst working Netatalk version"? Nope. > "pre-alpha" typically means "buggy as hell"... Not in this case. The reason why alpha/beta versions are necessary is that too many things have changed internally in Netatalk with this branch. Regards, Thomas |