From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-07-16 22:32:28
|
Patches item #2822337, was opened at 2009-07-16 10:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tanders You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=312694&aid=2822337&group_id=12694 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. >Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Frank Lichtenheld (djpig) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Memory leak in ipAddressPrefixTable Initial Comment: Version: 5.4.2.1 (+SUSE Patches) on SLES11 Valgrind says: ==20263== 1,620 bytes in 45 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 111 of 131 ==20263== at 0x482064B: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/x86-linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so) ==20263== by 0x214F39: _ba_iterator_get (container_binary_array.c:717) ==20263== by 0xFF189: ipAddressPrefixTable_container_load (ipAddressPrefixTable_data_access.c:217) ==20263== by 0xC7700: _cache_load (cache_handler.c:537) ==20263== by 0xC84C4: netsnmp_cache_helper_handler (cache_handler.c:477) ==20263== by 0xA5487: netsnmp_call_next_handler (agent_handler.c:435) ==20263== by 0xC9B88: table_helper_handler (table.c:619) ==20263== by 0xA4C66: netsnmp_call_handlers (agent_handler.c:435) ==20263== by 0x9427D: handle_var_requests (snmp_agent.c:2542) ==20263== by 0x95477: handle_getnext_loop (snmp_agent.c:2982) ==20263== by 0x982B7: netsnmp_handle_request (snmp_agent.c:3134) ==20263== by 0x9878C: handle_snmp_packet (snmp_agent.c:1864) Patch attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas Anders (tanders) Date: 2009-07-17 00:32 Message: moving to patches ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=312694&aid=2822337&group_id=12694 |