Menu
▾
▴
[ net-snmp-Bugs-1651207 ] 5.4 lists additional ppp0 instances after ip address change
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-05-14 12:53:44
|
Bugs item #1651207, was opened at 2007-02-03 13:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cilly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112694&aid=1651207&group_id=12694 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: agent Group: linux Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 5.4 lists additional ppp0 instances after ip address change Initial Comment: If you are on a dynamic IP and your provider assigns you a new IP, then the snmp is broken, it lists an additional ppp0 device after each ip-change even if ifconfig lists only one: snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost interface|grep ppp0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.61 = STRING: ppp0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.62 = STRING: ppp0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.63 = STRING: ppp0 See: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilly (cilly) Date: 2009-05-14 12:53 Message: Tested latest version of snmp, still not fixed, snmp increases and increases the number of the interface, no chance to monitor the interface. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilly (cilly) Date: 2008-11-24 19:12 Message: This bug isn't fixed! Please... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilly (cilly) Date: 2008-07-09 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=631605 Originator: NO bump ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilly (cilly) Date: 2008-02-07 21:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=631605 Originator: NO bump ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilly (cilly) Date: 2008-01-28 23:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=631605 Originator: NO When will this be fixed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilly (cilly) Date: 2007-08-28 15:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=631605 Originator: NO Just tested snmp 5.4.1, it is unusable with ipchanges. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas Anders (tanders) Date: 2007-08-28 14:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=848638 Originator: NO Nope, not yet fixed, unfortunately. Addressing it properly isn't trivial, unfortunately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilly (cilly) Date: 2007-08-28 14:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=631605 Originator: NO Is this bug fixed in 5.4.1? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2007-07-26 19:48 Message: Logged In: NO bump when will this be fixed? It is a really nasty bug and makes snmp with ppp0 unusable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilly (cilly) Date: 2007-06-30 03:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=631605 Originator: NO Is this bug fixed in CVS? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112694&aid=1651207&group_id=12694 |