From: Robert S. <rs...@fr...> - 2003-09-29 16:11:16
|
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:38:56 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > If somehow i get succeed..it will be very trivial solution...not a DS> > generalized one.. DS> DS> Hmmmm.... I'd be very surprised if this was a trivial problem. I agree with Dave. This would be a lot of work. If you are looking for a trivial solution, use multiple AgentX sub processes for your tables. DS> > has it been proposed earlier also, to make the agent multithreaded.. DS> > or is it in the future plans???.... DS> DS> I'm not aware of any definite plans to address this, no. Me either. Until someone with a lot of spare time or funding comes along (are you listening, Sun?), it's not likely to happen. Most people just don't need thread support in the agent. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie, NET-POLICY Flunkie <irc://irc.openprojects.net/#net-snmp> <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.openprojects.net/#net-policy> <http://net-policy.sourceforge.net/> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. |