Re: [Ndiswrapper-general] Problems with Intel Wireless 2100 3B
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
pgiri
From: Tomas S. <sz...@pi...> - 2004-01-05 18:14:56
|
On Jan-05 2004, Mon, 13:08 -0500 Navindra Umanee <nav...@cs...> wrote: > I read the FAQ, it doesn't say it's silly. It says it's not practical > for various reasons including the fact that the you would have to > rewrite *existing* code and issues concerning g++ support. I'd argue the main argument actually lies in the dangerous powerful language features. I chose the adjective "silly," because for me, that's what "impractical" translates to in systems programming. But that is all, of course, only my opinion. Sorry for the off-topic subthread. -- Tomas Szepe <sz...@pi...> |