[Nasm-devel] versioning suggestion

[anonymous c. <nas...@ya...>]

I'd like to suggest that (a) NASM 0.98.39/40 remain the
stable line for 32-bit only versions, (b) NASM 0.99 be
branched off a suitable 0.98.xx version, and become the
development line, for e.g. x64 work, and (c) NASM 1.00
eventually be branched off 0.99.xx to become the stable
line again.

(That is, bug fixes should go into 0.98.xx, as well as
into 0.99.xx; by contrast, 0.99.xx work should not go
back into 0.98.xx.)

I'm worried about potential future/massive changes that
might de-stabilize the 0.98.xx line.

There really needs to be a safe "fallback point".


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
TV dinner still cooling? 
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/