From: Eric C. <ech...@ap...> - 2005-09-22 01:26:54
|
> seem to be a problem (if you can call it that) in the rdoff stuff. > Thanks for bringing that to our attention, Eric! > Heh. I'll look around in outmacho.c for other instances of weird stuff. > > As far as I'm concerned, the mach-o stuff can go into CVS as soon > as anybody's ready - that way we'll have a record of any changes > that need to be made. Many small changes are better than one big > "codebomb" of a change (as I hear the "K" folks are complaining > about). OK, I've got the first drop ready (attached). I've noticed that the ChangeLog hasn't been used lately so I've not written one, but I'm more than happy to use the ChangeLog. There are some problems with the port as yet: a) the string and symbol tables need to be sorted (in a couple of ways) and the symbols renumbered afterward b) local labels should be elided in the output Now b can be ignored for now even for proper behavior - I believe, but a has to be done to be able to get workable executables. These are the next couple of things on the todo list. Any more comments before I commit? -eric |